(National Sentinel) Elections: Poor Hillary Clinton. Her narcissism has consumed her completely, as evidenced by the current “blame tour” she has apparently launched.
As reported by the Washington Times, Clinton is once again placing the onus for her loss not on the fact that she was a terrible candidate – untrustworthy, uninspiring and, frankly, having the last name of Clinton (the establishment candidate) on her party, on James Comey’s FBI, and of course, “The Russians.”
“I set up my campaign and we have our own data operation. I get the nomination. So I’m now the nominee for the Democratic Party. I inherit nothing from the Democratic Party. I mean, it was bankrupt,” she said at the Code Conference in California.
“I had to inject money into it to keep it going.”
Yes, of course; money from, say, foreign donors?
Then she pivoted to the Russia angle:
“The other side was using content that was just flat out false, and delivering it in a very personalized way, both above the radar screen and below,” Mrs. Clinton said. “That really influenced the information that people were relying on. And there have been some studies since the election. The vast majority of the news items posted were fake. They were connected to the bots that were just out of control.”
When asked if she felt President Trump knew about the Russian influence and the fake posts, she said yes.
“Yes, I’m leaning Trump,” she said. “I think it’s pretty hard not to.”
Mrs. Clinton also said that while her campaign tried to grapple with what was happening, most people felt that her victory was inevitable so the Russia issue could be passed off until after the election.
“I believe that what was happening to me was unprecedented,” she said. “I also think I was the victim of a very broad assumption I was going to win. I never believed that. I always believed it was going to be a close election because our elections are always close.”
Yes, Mrs. Clinton, there certainly was a healthy dose of fake news, but most of that was skewed to make it appear as though your nomination and resultant election victory was a foregone conclusion; remember all of those fake polls that showed you comfortably ahead? Of course, that was only after the press figured out your own party was skewing the nomination process in your favor, to wall off a rising Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt.
If anyone got the shaft, it was him. And if the Democratic Party machine helped anyone, it was you.
Even her Left-wing media friends think she’s completely ‘out there’ on this, and that includes NBC News‘ chief White House correspondent, Andrea Mitchell, who is no fan of Trump. She said last night on MSNBC that Clinton’s accusation that Americans directed and colluded with Russia to “weaponize information” against her is “basically pointing to the Trump campaign,” a charge where Clinton “doesn’t have the evidence,” and is “drawing a conspiracy theory.”
This woman has some mental issues she needs to deal with. Thank goodness she’s not our president.Click here for reuse options!
Copyright 2017 The National Sentinel