Advertisements
The Latest:

NY Times FAIL: Sara Carter reports Peter Strzok wasn’t fired for ‘Anti-Trump texts’

(National SentinelFake News: The “failing” New York Times, as POTUS Donald Trump likes to call the newspaper, failed again on Monday when it reported that the primary reason behind the FBI’s firing of former counterintelligence official Peter Stzrok was largely due to text messages he exchanged with former FBI lawyer and lover Lisa Page, in which he expressed a lot of animus toward the president.

But in a statement to ace investigative journalist Sara A. Carter, the FBI makes it crystal clear Strzok’s firing was for cause — not “texts,” although it seems as plain as day that both Strzok and Page were working behind the scenes to thwart POTUS Trump’s election chances and then undermine his presidency

She reported:

In a statement to SaraACarter.com on Monday, the FBI said: “Mr. Strzok was subject to the standard FBI review and disciplinary process after conduct highlighted in the IG report was referred to the FBI’s Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR).”

“OPR reviewed the investigative materials, as well as the written and oral responses of Mr. Strzok and his counsel, and issued OPR’s decision,” an FBI spokesperson said. “The Deputy Director, as the senior career FBI official, has the delegated authority to review and modify any disciplinary findings and/or penalty as deemed necessary in the best interest of the FBI.”

Strzok was under oath before Congress and he made statements that appeared to be false and refused to answer some questions, but he was going to get just a slap on the wrist,” said a former supervisory special agent from OPR adjudication, who spoke on condition of anonymity due to the nature of their work. 

“There is absolutely no wiggle room when it comes to lack of candor in the FBI…unless you’re an SES (Senior Executive Service). Strzok’s firing went well beyond texting about Trump. Strzok would have also been involved in the handling of the FISA (Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act) application to the FISC (Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court)…”

The agent noted that Strzok was “well aware that he was lying by deception when they did not include the information on who paid for the dossier and (that) Bruce Ohr was back-channeling information for a discredited source.

Strzok knew they were not putting the application in the right context,” the former FBI supervisory special agent added. “If there was the slightest doubt if that application was not 100 percent true, then that application would not go forward.”

As we reported previously, the Justice Department’s recent document dump on Carter Page, a former 2016 Trump campaign official against whom the FBI obtained a FISA warrant, Strzok was not truthful during congressional testimony when he said he had nothing to do with the FISA application.

It took a year for government watchdog Judicial Watch to receive those documents.

And though the arrived heavily redactedthere is are already a few bombshells that can be gleaned from them.

For one, anti-Trump FBI thug Peter Strzok may have perjured himself in his recent testimony before a joint hearing of the House Judiciary and Oversight committees when he claimed he had nothing to do with obtaining those FISA warrants against Page.

“The docs reveal Peter Strzok used Carter Page’s September 2016 letter to Comey as a ‘pretext’ to open investigation on him,” The Gateway Pundit reported, adding:

Sara Carter also noted that the head of the Office of Professional Responsibility is run by a woman named Candace Will; she was appointed to run the OPR in 2004 by then-FBI Director ROBERT MUELLER–so perhaps that’s why the OPR recommended Peter Strzok only be suspended and demoted rather than fired.

Does that surprise anyone?

Read Sara’s full report here.


Never miss a story! Subscribe to our daily newsletter and get our new report “The Spygate Files” for free!

* indicates required

Email Format

Advertisements

Have something to say?

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: