The Latest:

About those bombs sent to Democrats and CNN: None detonated, which is a ‘huge clue’

(National SentinelElection 2018: As you likely are aware, several “crude” explosive devices were sent by someone to a number of prominent Democrats and at least one news channel, CNN, on Wednesday.

As you are also likely aware, none of the bombs went off.

Make of that what you will, but there are investigative reporters — no, real ones — who have been looking into this without peering through a partisan lens.

Some of them are also talking to authorities like the FBI and other police agencies. And they’re being told some things that you’re not likely going to hear from the “establishment” media because they are too busy blaming the incidents on POTUS Donald Trump because they are unhinged Leftists who are using this opportunity to bash him and Republicans.

And that in and of itself is a huge tell (clue).

First of all, let’s examine what we know:

— None of the half-dozen or so bombs sent to Bill and Hillary Clinton, former President Obama, CNN, and former CIA Director John Brennan went off.

— All of the explosive devices were intercepted, most at postal distribution centers.

— Every single device was sent to a Trump/GOP critic.

— The return address on all of the devices was the office of Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz in Fla.

— The 2018 midterm elections are less than two weeks away.

Investigative journalist Adam Housley said he spoke to some federal agents working this case. They told him there is a lot of significance in the fact that none of the devices detonated. In fact, that is a “huge clue.”

“Federal agents say they are working on the theory that it’s one group, or one person. Also…the fact that none of them detonated is more significant than people may realize. I am told that’s a ‘huge clue,'” he tweeted.

“Also being investigated…and this is kinda obvious…whether all packages came from expedited carriers. It would make sense why they all arrived around the same time and stamps may have not been cancelled [sic],” he added.

Authorities are looking into multiple possibilities such as, is this a false flag? A distraction? Is it a dry run for the real deal?

“The fact that the devices were crude of course is a clue, but again…there are other variables that you may not think of. All this has to be taken into consideration by law enforcement. Dry Run? Hoax? True intention? Distraction for something else? Just a few examples I’m told,” Housley wrote.

No one is saying this is a false flag but rather, Housley is asking questions like real journalists are supposed to do.

“To clarify to anyone trying to politicize: I am insinuating nothing. Just reporting actual facts. Imagine that. Actual possibilities and what investigators are doing. Nowhere did I say false flag. It is one possibility tho, as is dry run. Get it?”

Investigative reporter Paul Sperry also offered this: “6 bombs sent to Democrats. 0 go off. All crudely made pipe bombs and conspicuously obvious explosives, and all easily screened and discovered. Stunt seems designed for maximum political/media optics, not maximum damage.”

[Actually, the count is up to nine now, including one sent to Trump critic and actor Robert DeNiro, but the other facts remain the same.]

He then used Wile E. Coyote as a prop to suggest this could all just be a hoax: “The pipe bombs might as well have had ‘ACME’ stamped on them. Totally telegraphed by packaging (excessive postage, taping), amateur packing of gun powder [sic] (bad end caps, etc)”

Finally, investigative reporter Laura Loomer offered this:

“First of all, John Brennan is a contributor for NBC, not CNN.

If you’re smart enough to make a bomb, you’re smart enough to pay attention to details like that.

This is looking more unreliable every minute.

None of the packages were delivered to anyone’s residence. It’s a lie.”

Time will tell. But as we mentioned earlier, critics of POTUS Trump and Republicans — like CNN chief Jeff Zucker — have already come out to blame them for this.

That said, whoever did this deserves to be locked up for a very, very long time.

Never miss a story! Sign up for our daily email newsletter — Click here!


15 Comments on About those bombs sent to Democrats and CNN: None detonated, which is a ‘huge clue’

  1. Surely sounds like false flag. Commie/socialist, hate mongering, prejudiced Democrats could have dreamed this stunt up so as to provoke sympathy for Democrat candidates.

  2. TinCanPhone24 // October 25, 2018 at 9:07 am // Reply

    Just like the illegal immigrant parade coursing through Mexico, this seems like another false event designed to hurt the GOP chances in the mid-terms.
    Even a moronic neo-nazi type would have to understand that these devices would be easily revealed, and that it would turn a lot of negative attention to the GOP at a sensitive time.
    I believe this a total sham, and if we have some non-deep state investigators left in the FBI, it will be easily exposed as such.
    I don’t suspect any large-name progressives connected with this… but likely some unhinged leftist who believes it will damage the GOP at just the right time.

  3. Bernie supporter???

  4. I hope they get whoever did it. I kinda think they were not intended to hurt anyone.. I can’t believe that these things were delivered where there are secret service in some cases and not one of these controversial rich people has video security. I think it’s all for show.
    Regardless who ever is found responsible should go to prison for a long time.

  5. Created and sent by your average run of the mill liberal for sympathy. Sympathy for liberals = Mission Impossible.

  6. Which side has the most to gain by delivering these ‘dead’ bombs? Wouldn’t they be the ones who most likely did this for political reasons?

  7. I agree with the false flag idea, but this comment is on “real journalism.” Having studied journalism in college the things I see in this report and almost all other “articles” such as this violate one main tenant of good writing. Quoting a Tweet and then directly below it reposting the same tweet, with identical text is shoddy at best and punishable by no further accpetence of garbage writing like this. Can these folks not realize that doubling your satement does nothing but bore the average reader? I wish these “writers” would learn to read their own posting before actually posting it. MAGA Mr President.

  8. UK SUN says powder in pipe is sulfur. Stink bomb when you open it.

  9. If some oddball takes a piece of pipe and fills it with, say, powdered sugar, and kind of makes it look like a bomb, but provides no means of detonation, not to mention that powdered sugar does not explode anyway….. Can one honestly refer to this as a “bomb”? Politicians, media people or even investigative personal may possibly feel more self-important by calling it a “bomb”, but is it really honest speech to call something a “bomb” that is unable to explode and was never even meant to explode? Isn’t this in itself deception?

  10. LOL! The packages were LABELLED as bombs! What a scam…

  11. When you say none detonated, you mean none injured anyone, or none could be detonated by authorities?

    • NONE DETONATED….. NONE EXPLODED…..And apparently, were never MEANT to explode. They were fake. It’s all optics. Is that sufficiently down to Dick & Jane level for you to understand?

      • Thank you Reg. Did authorities deliberately attempt to detonate them and could not is the question.

  12. Fake bombs for fake news.
    Do not be fooled. If these bombs were meant to actually hurt someone, why did not a single one detonate? Obviously planted by a democRATIc left-wing operative in an attempt to hurt President Trump and Republicans before the elections.
    What better way to take the narrative away from the caravans? This has DemocRATs stamped all over it. VOTE AND VOTE RED!!


Have something to say?

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: