Advertisements
The Latest:

Pelosi promises ‘swift action’ on new bill expanding background checks for gun purchases

(National SentinelUnconstitutional: As promised, incoming House Speaker Nancy Pelosi says the new Democratic majority will introduce legislation expanding background checks for all gun purchases, including those that currently take place between individuals.

“The new Democratic majority will act boldly and decisively to pass commonsense, life-saving background checks that are overwhelmingly supported by the American people,” Pelosi said, Politico reported Monday.

Democratic California Rep. Mike Thompson, an ally of Pelosi, said a bill for universal background checks will be introduced to Congress in early 2019. He is leading the effort, Politico noted.

“The American people want this. They’re way ahead of the Congress, they’re way ahead of the White House,” Thompson said, according to Politico. “I think you will see it happen in the first 100 days [of 2019].”

Rep. Jerrold Nadler, D-N.Y., who is set to take over the House Judiciary Committee, said, “We told the American voters that we do mean to do this, and we do mean to do it.”

Some polls say as many as 60 percent of Americans favor stricter gun control, and Democrats are only too happy to give it to them.

But the fact is, it doesn’t matter how the issue polls: Gun rights are protected by the Constitution. What’s more, the Second Amendment says that those rights “shall not be infringed;” subjecting someone to a “background check” is akin to forcing them to get federal government permission to exercise their right.

Imagine if some lawmaker introduced a “background check” requirement for anyone wishing to launch their own news site on the pretense of ensuring factual information was published? Or speech on the pretense of protecting against “hateful” words? Or to practice their religion?

Why is the Second Amendment the only one subjected to government permission?

Any gun control laws, when you look at the very plain language of the Second Amendment, could be considered as a violation of the “infringement” clause.

This is certainly true of requiring citizens to get permission from the federal government to exercise their right to keep and bear arms.

Never miss a story! Sign up for our daily email newsletter — Click here!


Advertisements

2 Comments on Pelosi promises ‘swift action’ on new bill expanding background checks for gun purchases

  1. desertspeaks // December 17, 2018 at 6:40 pm // Reply

    will someone, anyone tell the alzheimers patient that CRIMINALS RARELY EVER ATTEMPT to buy a gun in a legitimate gun store.. background checks only affect the LAWFUL BUYER, ie the non criminal!

  2. Listen, step back and see the big picture. ALL OF THIS is part and parcel of the globalist agenda to disarm Americans like they disarmed Australia. Not happenin’ !!!!!!! We are not giving up our guns. WE are responsible, trained, mature users of these tools of defense and there is no reason on this Earth why we should not have the freedom to possess and use them. Pelosi is a globalist minion who needs to fund her multi-million dollar life and will do anything to maintain it, so when the Overlords give her the order to use ALL her time to take the guns away from Americans, then she does it. WE THE PEOPLE must never yield to such goddamn SCUMBAGS !

Have something to say?

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: