Advertisements
The Latest:

Dems’ plan to steal every presidential election by subverting Electoral College, stacking the Supreme Court, and flooding America with illegal voters

By J. D. Heyes

Long-serving Democratic leaders at the national level may be worried that younger members of their party are too Left-wing radical for them and America in general, but that hasn’t stopped the party from shifting further towards that direction, politically.

The country isn’t yet ready for socialism or radical authoritarianism that the Left represents, but demographically we are moving in that direction, thanks to the virulent anti-Americanism that’s been fed to Millennials and Generation Z via our public education system and higher learning institutes.

That said, the same leaders concerned about how to handle the “Democratic socialists” like Alexandria Ocacio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) and virulent anti-Semites like Ilhan Omar and Rashida Tlaib are nevertheless using that extremism to push a far-Left agenda that, truth be told, most of them have long supported in private.

We see it in the party’s 2020 presidential offerings. Thus far, candidates who make up the increasingly crowded field have yet to differentiate themselves; all are embracing several socialist-Marxist ideas and policies with the same vigor that the younger party members have brought with them to Washington.

And what are they? In no particular order, 2020 Dems are pushing socialist healthcare (even beyond what Obama and his Democrats proposed and passed); basic universal incomes; the gutting of America’s fossil fuel sector and with it the toppling of our energy industry; infanticide; open borders.

In addition, the candidates are openly advocating policies and tactics that, if enacted, would destroy our constitutional electoral process as founded. But Democrats will happily implement them in exchange for their party’s presidential nominee winning the White House in election after election, in perpetuity. 

One, Democrats are pushing to expand the number of justices on the U.S. Supreme Court. They had no such desires when Obama was putting Leftist judicial activists Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan on the high court, but now that POTUS Trump is filling vacancies with constitutionalists, Democrats want to pack the court with more ‘like-minded’ justices so they can negate the peskiest provisions in the Constitution such as the Second Amendment.

Speaking of the Constitution, Democrats are also pushing a concept called the National Popular Vote Compact, which is a plan to steal the required 270 electoral votes to put Democrats in the White House in perpetuity. This will effectively neuter the Electoral College and implement a “democratic” majority vote scheme our founders studiously avoided, and for good reasons.

Also, Democrats are continuing to throw up roadblocks (with some Republican help) in front of POTUS Trump’s efforts to control illegal immigration because they hope to someday empower millions of people in the country illegally with the ‘right’ to vote in our federal elections. Oh, and they want all 16-year-olds to vote even though they won’t let them serve in the military until they’re 18 or buy a gun until they’re 21.

We’re under no illusions about the fact that Democrats won’t be very successful in proposing this stuff for the short term. There’s no way they’ll get any of this extremism through a Republican-controlled Senate or past POTUS Trump. But what happens in the future is anyone’s guess, and clearly, the party is sending out feelers and setting down markers. The extreme Left is where the party wants to go.

A major element in the Democrats’ strategy in the meantime is to fire up their voting base ahead of the 2020 elections. No matter who wins the nomination, chances are better than excellent he or she will have espoused one, two, or more of these ideas at some point on the campaign trail, and polling data now indicate that these crazy ideas are increasingly popular with the Democrat base.

As time goes on, more of the party will warm to these ideas. After enough time passes, the requisite number of Democrats will have been elected to implement them; once that happens, you can kiss goodbye any hope of a fair electoral process or that key liberties and protections provided by the Constitution will survive.

A version of this story first appeared at NewsTarget. Used with permission.

Never miss a story! Sign up for our daily email newsletter — Click here!


Advertisements

9 Comments on Dems’ plan to steal every presidential election by subverting Electoral College, stacking the Supreme Court, and flooding America with illegal voters

  1. Garden-variety Republican have sat on the side lines for years, never bothering to volunteer for even one day of manning the polls, much less any get-out-the-vote campaigns. This can be blamed on the RINO leaderships’ failures and the fact that the party has permitted itself to be infiltrated by Democratic operatives who have neutralized the party regulars.
    Most garden-variety Republicans don’t have a clue about the Big Picture the globalists have for our country and our world. They seem to think it is a fantasy (aka conspiracy theory), or if not that, it is too unpleasant to consider and dismiss it.
    Republicans have lost just about every elected office at every level, including dog catcher.
    NOW we are wondering about closing the barn door?

  2. nico demus // March 21, 2019 at 9:56 am // Reply

    Should we have an Electoral College?

    I think the answer lies in whether or not you believe the United States is a democracy or a constitutional republic. A republic, Madison writes, is different from a democracy because its government is placed in the hands of delegates, and, as a result of this, it can be extended over a larger area. They wanted a republic diverse enough to prevent faction but with enough commonality to maintain cohesion among the states. I understand why some are not satisfied with this form of government and would prefer a pure democracy where the popular vote is all that matters. The problem I have with a democracy is that the popular vote is not representative of the entire 50 states. If, for example, most of the population lives in concentrated areas such as Los Angeles or New York City, it is probable that a presidential election outcome would be determined by 4 or 5 cities with very different needs and interests than say the rust belt. Why is it fair for 5 cities with the greatest population to determine the outcome of an election? If the popular vote were the sole criteria used for determining election outcomes, what motivation would any politician have to campaign or pay any attention to rural and suburban areas? Is our system perfect? No it is not, but I do believe it is a good compromise where most times both the popular vote and the electoral college determine the outcome (except in 5 cases).

    One of the reasons that Trump won was he campaigned and appealed to middle class Americans in rural areas in Ohio, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, North Carolina, Florida, etc. Hillary focused most of her effort in states with the greatest populations such as California, New York and Illinois. I happen to believe that our founding fathers realized what they were doing and understood that a country as large as ours with 50 states (17 states in 1804) and competing and varied interests and needs could not survive very long with a democratic government that was solely determined by popular vote.

    Another point I would like to make concerns the distribution of senators between states. Many of the presidential candidates are complaining that large states like California should have 6 senators while small states like New Hampshire should have one senator. How is this fair? Unless, of course, you accept the proposition that the popular vote is all that matters. What about fair and equal representation? There is nothing fair in telling the smaller states that your vote and opinions do not matter. Since when is giving all of the power and resources to the most powerful and influential, at the expense of the small and weak, fair? In my opinion, the only fair system is the Constitutional Republic that believes in democracy.

    FYI…. Five times a candidate has won the popular vote and lost the election. Andrew Jackson in 1824 (to John Quincy Adams); Samuel Tilden in 1876 (to Rutherford B. Hayes); Grover Cleveland in 1888 (to Benjamin Harrison); Al Gore in 2000 (to George W. Bush); Hillary Clinton in 2016 (to Donald J. Trump).

    One last thought, each state is awarded a certain number of electors based upon the size of it’s population. Currently, there are 538 electors; based on 435 representatives, 100 senators, and three electors allocated to Washington, D.C. The six states with the most electors are California (55), Texas (38), New York (29), Florida (29), Illinois (20), and Pennsylvania (20).

    Again, maybe this is not a “perfect” system, but it has mostly worked beautifully.

  3. Trump lost the overall popular vote by 2,868,686. Hillary carried the popular vote in California by 4,269,978 vote. If you remove California from the equation – Trump won the popular vote in the other 49 states by 1,401,292 votes.

    What this shows us is that the founding fathers got it right when the Electoral College system was set up. The intent was to insure that one large state could not negate the will of the voters in the other states.

    It cracks me up when I hear libs touting the fact that Hillary won the popular vote. When you look at the individual states, and point out the disparity is the California vote totals it shows that Hillary really did a lot worse than most of her supporters would admit in the overall vote totals.

  4. WE THE PEOPLE expected nothing less from these psychotic gargoyles.
    Too bad they’re all born losers.

  5. Blue Highway // March 21, 2019 at 12:32 pm // Reply

    Will the commiecrats finally be happy when they have their hybrid Zimbabwe/Venezuela/Cuba utopia?
    Yes rhetorical questions are fun. If not for the mountain of human skulls that always results when utopia building fails all of this would be good for a laugh.
    Do you think the comrades won’t be out for revenge when they retake the bestest government that money can buy?
    Enjoy the time that Trump is buying us and use it wisely to prepare for Armageddon times seven when the Bolsheviks are back in the seat of power in the district of cesspool.

    • Yep. This is their plan. How do we stop
      it ? We tried voting and that didn’t work.
      RINOs have been the biggest problem.
      I hate to sound pessimistic but it’s starting to look bleak. Still hoping we and Trump can MAGA.

    • Their first order of business will be gun confiscation.

    • BilboQBaggins // March 21, 2019 at 1:36 pm // Reply

      If the socialist-democrats would come up with a platform that acts to improve conditions for working, taxpaying US citizens and permanent residents, they might not have to corrupt the election system with their unconstitutional antics. But, since socialist-democrats are strictly in it for the corrupt money and globalist power, it’s very apparent they don’t give a rat’s behind for the American people. Just show them the money.

  6. Curmudgeon // March 21, 2019 at 4:39 pm // Reply

    What people seem to forget, is that Lincoln, and his followers, corrupted the process. The founders understood that the Feds had limited powers, and the States were independent in most respects, other than the few relatively few powers granted to them. The Electoral College was one way, along with the States appointing Senators, to maintain some balance of the interests of the state with the interests of the Feds.
    As for the alleged “socialists” in the Democratic party, they are no such thing. No real self respecting socialist would be in favor of open borders and/or mass immigration. A real socialist understands, very well, that immigration is a tool of capital to suppress wages and keep unemployment high. A real socialist understands that a dollar spent on an immigrant, legal or otherwise, is a dollar not available to be spent on a citizen. The alleged “socialists” are really Soros globalists, who are infinitely more dangerous to the US than real socialists, who, by the way, do not insist on the ownership of the means of production, but do insist on being in control of the central bank.
    .

8 Trackbacks / Pingbacks

  1. Leftists pushing “vote by phone” scheme to rig all future elections and allow illegals more say Americans
  2. Leftists pushing “vote by phone” scheme to rig all future elections and allow illegals to out-vote American citizens - Conservative News & Right Wing News | Gun Laws & Rights News Site : Conservative News & Right Wing News | Gun Laws &
  3. Democrats Come Up With New Scheme To Rig Election And It Might Just Work - News Mail 24
  4. Democrats Come Up With New Scheme To Rig Election And It Might Just Work – News Point
  5. Democrats Come Up With New Scheme To Rig Election And It Might Just Work – News On-24
  6. Democrats Come Up With New Scheme To Rig Election And It Might Just Work – Politico Usa
  7. Democrats Come Up With New Scheme To Rig Election And It Might Just Work – News America 24
  8. Democrats Come Up With New Scheme To Rig Election And It Might Just Work - Usa On

Have something to say?

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: