Advertisements

Subpoena happy: Dems consider forcing Robert Mueller to testify as GOP members rail against the machine

By Jon Dougherty

Angry House Democrats who have been thwarted by POTUS Donald Trump’s claims of executive privilege as he pushes back against their attempts to force him to turn over years worth of financial records are now turning their ire on former special counsel Robert Mueller, who does not want to testify before Congress in public.

Late Tuesday, some Democrats were predicting that Mueller would be subpoenaed to appear before various House committees to testify, essentially, as to why he didn’t recommend the president of the United States be charged with a crime, despite the fact that he hasn’t committed one.

“I think he will have to be subpoenaed,” Rep. Jackie Speier (D-Calif.), a member of the House Intelligence Committee, told The Hill.

“He’s critical. He basically made the case for obstruction of justice and we need to hear from him,” she said.

And naturally, Democrats will want him to testify publicly because if they can’t broadcast the clown show to the American people, it’s not worth doing.

Meanwhile, Rep. Steve “Chicken Man” Cohen (D-Tenn.), who used a tub of Kentucky Fried Chicken as a prop to rail against Attorney General William Barr for refusing to testify in committee earlier this month, also claims that Mueller must — must — testify because, “It’s so important for the American public.”


Also, Rep. Hank Johnson (D-Ga.), a member of the House Judiciary Committee, would not say whether he supported subpoenaing Mueller. But he added that he’s open to hearing arguments for Mueller to testify privately.

This all comes as Judiciary chairman Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.) continues to threaten to subpoena Mueller, though he always couches that with, ‘But I don’t really want to.’

Except that he does, because putting on a clown show is all Democrats have; they don’t have a criminal president, they don’t have Russian collusion, and they don’t have an agenda.

POTUS Donald Trump weighed in on the madness early this morning, of course, on Twitter.

The Hill noted that the push to subpoena Mueller and just about everyone else who ever spoke to POTUS much less worked for him is bound to generate negative headlines that nobody in the party really wants (except the nut jobs).

Still, the subpoena frenzy continues, as the New York Post reports.

The House Judiciary Committee is now demanding former White House aide Hope Hicks and Annie Donaldson, an aide to former White House Counsel Don McCahn, appear for a congressional hokey-pokey dance:

The subpoenas direct Hicks to turn over documents by June 4 and testify on June 19.

Another subpoena requires Annie Donaldson, McGahn’s former chief of staff, to hand over the documents by June 4 and appear June 24.

The House Judiciary Committee voted to authorize the subpoenas for Hicks and Donaldson in April the same time it sought subpoenas for Attorney General William Barr to release to Congress a full, unredacted version of special counsel Robert Mueller’s 448-page report.

McGahn refused to show up to the clown show on Tuesday, per instructions from the White House, which is attempting to protect not just POTUS Trump but the office of the presidency itself and the authority under separation of powers of the Executive Branch.

You Might Like

Republicans on the Judiciary Committee have had enough. Ranking member Rep. Doug Collins (R-Ga.) had some words for Nadler at the hearing:

That move has eninsured the witness will not testify. This is becoming a pattern. The chairman knew this when he sent the subpoena last month but instead of inviting him to testify voluntarily the chairman rushed to maximize headlines by issuing a subpoena. That subpoena was the third in just four months. More subpoenas than the prior chairman issued in six years. The chairman has several ways out here. He took none of them. The chairman could have invited the witness to testify voluntarily. That was the practice in the ’90s when the White House’s counsel testified before Congress.

The chairman launched a subpoena at the witness without any consultation or follow-up with the witness’s lawyer. The chairman could have invited the witness to testify behind closed doors but that would have been politically expedient and you wouldn’t have been here and the show wouldn’t have been as exciting. Even gaveling in today’s hearing without a witness is theatrical. The cameras love the spectacle. I just am glad today to see that we don’t have chicken on the dais.

It’s going to be a long summer.

Be the first to receive our latest video reports: Subscribe to our YouTube Channel by clicking here and pro-liberty video platform Brighteon by clicking here


Trending Politics

2
Leave a Reply

avatar
2 Comment threads
0 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  Subscribe  
Notify of
Joe D
Guest
Joe D

Please democrats, force Mueller to testify under oath. The republicans have so many questions for him. The republicans want to know at what point did he know that there was no collusion between Trump and Russia, and did he purposely delay releasing that information to assist the democrats during the mid-term election for political purposes. Mueller was ordered to identify the areas in his report that were sensitive and required redacting to assist the Justice Department with the quick release of the report. Why did the tax payers fork out more than 30 million dollars, and Mueller could not do… Read more »

Dictatorship Of the Proletariat
Guest
Dictatorship Of the Proletariat

Airbrush esteemed party member Comrade Mueller from all photos. No VIP seating at true believer rallies for Comrade Kommissar. IRS audit time for this jive ass honky cracka.
He is a wrongthink Kulak thoughtcriminal untermenschen for not stopping the baaad orange maan!

%d bloggers like this: