Advertisements

Alan Dershowitz is having Mueller buy-in remorse: ‘I was wrong about him, he’s a hack’

By Jon Dougherty

Noted liberal constitutional law professor Alan Dershowitz noted on Thursday during in an op-ed that his faith in former special counsel Robert Mueller to be a non-partisan instrument of the law and justice was shattered after his politicized press conference yesterday.

Dershowitz, a frequent critic of fellow liberals’ legal and political tactics against POTUS Donald Trump, wrote in his op/ed for The Hill entitled, “Shame on Robert Mueller for Exceeding His Role,” that Mueller overstepped his bounds as a prosecutor, while lacing him for having erred even more seriously than fellow ex-FBI Director James Comey and adding that he can’t defend Mueller as non-partisan any longer.


“Comey was universally criticized for going beyond his responsibility to state whether there was sufficient evidence to indict Clinton. Mueller, however, did even more. He went beyond the conclusion of his report and gave a political gift to Democrats in Congress who are seeking to institute impeachment proceedings against President Trump,” he wrote.

“By implying that President Trump might have committed obstruction of justice, Mueller effectively invited Democrats to institute impeachment proceedings. Obstruction of justice is a ‘high crime and misdemeanor’ which, under the Constitution, authorizes impeachment and removal of the president…

“Until today, I have defended Mueller against the accusations that he is a partisan,” he continued. I did not believe that he personally favored either the Democrats or the Republicans, or had a point of view on whether President Trump should be impeached.

“But I have now changed my mind. By putting his thumb, indeed his elbow, on the scale of justice in favor of impeachment based on obstruction of justice, Mueller has revealed his partisan bias. He also has distorted the critical role of a prosecutor in our justice system.”

He added:

No prosecutor should ever say or do anything for the purpose of helping one party or the other. I cannot imagine a plausible reason why Mueller went beyond his report and gratuitously suggested that President Trump might be guilty, except to help Democrats in Congress and to encourage impeachment talk and action. Shame on Mueller for abusing his position of trust and for allowing himself to be used for such partisan advantage.

At The Federalist, Sean Davis noted that Mueller’s reversed his role as a prosecutor (to that of judge and jury) and completely turned American jurisprudence — innocent until proven guilty — on its head:

DOJ guidelines expressly prohibit the actions of both Comey and Mueller in naming and shaming individuals who were never formally charged with any wrongdoing.

“As a series of cases makes clear, there is ordinarily ‘no legitimate governmental interest served’ by the government’s public allegation of wrongdoing by an uncharged party, and this is true ‘regardless of what criminal charges may . . . b[e] contemplated by the Assistant United States Attorney against the [third-party] for the future,’” states DOJ’s formal policy manual on the duties of federal prosecutors and principles of federal prosecutions.

Nationwide bar rules governing all practicing attorneys in the United States also explicitly prohibit Mueller’s display during Wednesday’s press conference.

“The prosecutor in a criminal case shall … refrain from making extrajudicial comments that have a substantial likelihood of heightening public condemnation of the accused,” states Rule 3.8(f) of the American Bar Association’s rules of professional conduct. Multiple federal agents and prosecutors reached out to The Federalist after Mueller’s press conference to express dismay at the former FBI director’s behavior.

“I’d have been crucified under this rule for a ‘not innocent’ comment about an uncharged party,” one former federal prosecutor told Davis in the piece.

I literally cannot fathom holding a press conference to say that an uncharged person was not innocent,” the source said.

These are not normal times, obviously.

The deep state is using whatever resources and tools it can to continue in its effort to depose a duly elected president.

Mueller has become one of those tools, and, apparently, willingly so.

This story has been published with fewer ads for maximum reader enjoyment. 

Be the first to receive our latest video reports: Subscribe to our YouTube Channel by clicking here and pro-liberty video platform Brighteon by clicking here

You Might Like


6
Leave a Reply

avatar
5 Comment threads
1 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  Subscribe  
Notify of
Gabacho Cauliflower
Guest
Gabacho Cauliflower

But I thought that the last boy scout was going to save the republic?
Wouldn’t it be ironic if some lawyer did save the republic!

guidvce4
Guest

Woof! Dershowitz nailed it, again. Mueller is no boy scout and has proven himself to be, in the words of Dershowitz, “a hack”.
With the history of Mueller in his many positions in the government, this has become crystal clear to anyone who has been paying attention to Mueller’s career. This incident is just another example of just how much of a partisan hack he is.
Google his history as an FBI director in the MA office, where he protected gangsters against prosecution because they were confidential informants.
Swamp creature extrordinarie.

V.Lombardi
Guest
V.Lombardi

Dersh knows a lot about law but he has shown an inability to pay attention to events. We all knew Mueller was a partisan hack 2 years ago when he stacked his gang with leftists, including Hillary lawyers. Dersh is partisan also, opposes indictments of the actual criminal officials.

Mueller’s history should be very well known to any expert following events. He has a long history back to Ruby Ridge, Waco, … Uranium sale, mailicious prosecutions, …

Jack Savage
Guest
Jack Savage

That picture at the top of this article makes me want to puke….the two on the right should be hanging from light posts and the one on the left should be locked up for a long, long time.

trackback

[…] After impugning the president — again — Mueller then pronounced that he won’t make himself available to testify before Congress because he doesn’t have anything else to say other that what’s in his report. (Related: Alan Dershowitz is having Mueller buy-in remorse: ‘I was wrong about him, he’s a hack.’) […]

%d bloggers like this: