Advertisements

GOP’s Collins blasts Nadler’s ‘fake impeachment’ hearings; reminds him of House rules forbidding ‘ridicule of the president’

By Jon Dougherty

In an effort to placate the party’s increasingly unhinged Left-wing base, Democrats in the House will hold what critics are calling “fake impeachment hearings” on Monday, though one Republican is reminding a powerful committee chairman of the chamber’s rules regarding the treatment of the president.

House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerrold Nadler (D-N.Y.) will hold a hearing featuring Watergate-era stoolie and convict John Dean, reputed to be the one who brought down President Richard Nixon though in reality, it was a series of tapes in which Nixon discussed obstructing justice and other crimes that actually did him in.

The hearing, “Lessons from the Mueller Report: Presidential Obstruction and Other Crimes,” is liable to be nothing more than a Democrat hate-fest aimed at ‘convicting’ POTUS Donald Trump of similar crimes in the court of public opinion, critics noted.

And that’s not allowed under current House rules, Rep. Doug Collins (R-Ga.), reminded Nadler in a scathing letter sent over the weekend.


“In light of Monday’s hearing…I am compelled to remind you— and request you remind the Majority Members of the Committee — the Rules of the House prohibit Members from ‘engag[ing] in personalities’ with Members of Congress, Senators, or the President,” Collins wrote.

“This appears to be part of a strategy to turn the Committee’s oversight hearings into a mock-impeachment inquiry rather than a legitimate exercise in congressional oversight. Conducting such hearings inevitably sets this Committee on a collision course with the longstanding Rules of the House, which you have apparently alluded to as recently as this week.”

The letter also directs Nadler and other panel Democrats to read Jefferson’s Manual on parliamentary procedure written by Thomas Jefferson which is incorporated into the rules of the House of Representatives.

As noted by PJ Media, Collins reminded Nadler:

  • Personal abuse, innuendo, or ridicule of the President is not permitted.
  • It is not in order to call the President a ‘‘liar’’ or accuse such person of “lying”.
  • It is not in order to cast aspersions on the ethical behavior of the President.
  • Accusations that the President has committed a crime, or even that the President has done something illegal, are unparliamentary.
  • Language impugning the patriotism or loyalty of the President is not in order.
  • Personally disparaging the manner in which the President carries out the duties of the office can constitute a personality, such as when the remarks suggest that the President is an undemocratic leader akin to a dictator.
  • A Member may not read in debate extraneous material personally abusive of the President that would be improper if spoken in the Member’s own words, such as material labeling the President’s statement a lie.

Collins also provided examples for each of the things he listed as being off-limits and out of order when it comes to discussing the president, per House rules.

And while impeachment proceedings allow for more “latitude,” that’s not what Nadler’s hearing is officially for, Collins noted.

“Although wide latitude is permitted in debate on a proposition to impeach the President, Members must abstain from language personally offensive; and Members must abstain from comparisons to the personal conduct of sitting Members of the House or Senate,” he wrote.

American Liberty: “Established 1776” Order yours now!

“Furthermore, when impeachment is not the pending business on the floor, Members may not refer to evidence of alleged impeachable offenses by the President contained in a communication from an independent counsel pending before a House committee, although they may refer to the communication, itself, within the confines of proper decorum in debate, and may not otherwise suggest that the President has done something worthy of censure or impeachment,” Collins said.

Former Watergate prosecutor Jon Sale, who managed to convict Dean and send him to prison, said Saturday that Nadler was just trying to pull off a “political stunt” featuring Dean as a ‘witness.’

“What is he, an expert in obstruction of justice?” Sale noted. “John Dean pled guilty to a conspiracy to obstruct justice. He participated in the payment of hush money. He even encouraged people to leave the country.”

None of that has anything at all to do with POTUS Trump and the allegations of Russian collusion, which, again, never happened, Sale continued.

This story has been published with fewer ads for maximum reader enjoyment. 

Be the first to receive our latest video reports: Subscribe to our YouTube Channel by clicking here and pro-liberty video platform Brighteon by clicking here

You Might Like


 

3
Leave a Reply

avatar
3 Comment threads
0 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  Subscribe  
Notify of
Pauline Cilley
Guest
Pauline Cilley

There are people who won’t comprehend that this is another “Fake News”…. just an act on the part of Nadler. He is digging his own “grave” politically.

Jerry Rockwell
Guest
Jerry Rockwell

Nadler could care less about parliamentary rules. He is not fit to clean the restrooms of the House. Nadler, I hear they are looking at you for the lead role in a remake of “Dumb and Dumber.” You Nancy, and Chuck are all be considered. Personally, I think you’d be the ideal candidate. You have my vote!

M Allen
Guest

Hopefully Nadler chokes on his lunch. We need to eradicate all these Anti-American leftists.

%d bloggers like this: