More censorship: Apple threatening to ban social media app Parler because it won’t punish conservatives

By J. D. Heyes, NewsTarget

(NationalSentinel) During a week in which the social media behemoths have been under fire in Congress and from disgusted Americans angry about Google’s purposeful censoring of conservative, pro-Trump voices with the objective of stealing the 2020 election for a Democrat, Apple flew under the radar for its own bias and censorship.

Until now, that is.

As reported by The Gateway Pundit, Apple has threatened to boot social media company “Parler” off its massive app store platform if they continue refusing to remove “offensive” comment — which, of course, is nothing but a dog whistle that means “conservative” content.

Parler, a First Amendment platform that many view as a viable alternative to Twitter, was founded by John Matze. He revealed this week that Apple officials contacted him more than a week ago by phone to inform him that he has to ban ‘offensive’ content or see his platform deplatformed by the tech giant.


“Obviously by offensive, they mean conservative content,” Matze wrote in a Parler post.

“We flat out refused and now we cannot push updates” to the app, he added. “Twitter is exempt from this clause as they generate more hatred than any platform in history.”

Apple has done the same thing to other companies — removed their app from the App Store over “offensive” (conservative) content. That includes the Natural News app, in which Apple banned updates, rendering it essentially moot and ineffective. 

In addition, as Natural News has reported, Apple banned a Christian app because its teachings about homosexuality were deemed “dangerous.” The app was removed after Left-wing anti-Christian groups convinced (which didn’t take long) Apple officials that the teaching of traditional family groups, traditional marriage, and traditional relationships just couldn’t be tolerated.

You Might Like

The affected organization, Living Hope Ministries, is anything but the “hate group” it was portrayed to be. The app, in particular, was aimed at helping people who were struggling with their feelings and with their faith. “Help people understand who they are in Christ,” said Ricky Chelette, the ministry’s executive director. “We only help those individuals who are seeking us.”

As for Parler, it’s community guidelines state:

Parler desires to stand behind the definition of free speech as laid out in the United States Constitution in order to firmly and clearly state the type of communication that is allowed and that is prohibited within our platform. All users have full control over their account(s) to create and sustain conversations within accepted legal boundaries. Free speech allows users to express themselves on their own profile and spread their message to their followers but it also allows users to avoid speech they do not want to see by blocking/banning or muting content they do not want to see.

Currently, social media companies are protected under the Communications Decency Act, Section 320, which defines them not as publishers who can be liable for content posted but as merely platforms for posted content.

American Liberty: “Established 1776” Order yours now!

However, by being selective about what kind of content can and cannot be posted to their platforms, the social media behemoths are acting just like publishers and, therefore, ought to be treated as such. If they were, they could be held liable for many violations of speech and content regulations, as well as unconstitutional behavior (like banning people for their political views).

Clearly, some Republicans are getting fed up with the actions of the far-Left tech giants and their purposeful targeted bias against Right-leaning politicians, content, and commentators, as evidenced by the grilling Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) and a House colleague from his state, Rep. Dan Crenshaw, gave representatives from the social media companies this week.

The problem is, as a Project Veritas undercover investigation revealed this week, nothing short of forcing these companies to treat users fairly will get them to change their practices.

  • A version of this story first appeared at NewsTarget.

Subscribe to our YouTube channel

Subscribe to our Brighteon channel

Sign up for our daily headlines newsletter


2
Leave a Reply

avatar
2 Comment threads
0 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  Subscribe  
Notify of
Oliver W. Homey
Guest
Oliver W. Homey

Apple is so far to the left it is sickening and of course will try to ban anything conservative. With the media in the lefts hip pocket by about 99-5 anything that does not fall in line cannot be tolerated by the leftist regime. But the left is so far off base, it is about time for Mr. Johnson to gear up the campaign.

Mr deplorable
Guest
Mr deplorable

Apples moving it’s computer manufacturing to a country with a political system that tim cook wants for all of us. If folks want to communicate with conservatives, apple is not the brand for you..buying apple products is/will be financing the downfall of the United Sates of America as a free country. This should be obvious.

%d bloggers like this: