Advertisements

Coroner’s report: Dayton shooter latest mass killer taking anti-depressants, illegal drugs during rampage

By Jon Dougherty

(NationalSentinel) The mass shooter in Dayton who killed nine people and wounded several others before being shot and killed himself by police was taking antidepressants and a cocktail of illicit drugs and alcohol during his rampage, according to a coroner’s report.



Montgomery County coroner Dr. Kent Harshbarger, in a draft report, noted that Connor Betts, 24, said Betts was in possession of a pipe, a bag of cocaine, and had cocaine, antidepressants, and alcohol in his blood during his attack.

That means Betts has become the latest mass shooter who was taking antidepressants, which some medical analysts and experts believe can have deleterious and dangerous effects on some people.

“This incident involved an intense firefight that is rarely seen other than combat and an active-shooter incident,” Dayton Police Chief Richard Biehl said. “The officers were confronted with a moving shooter wearing body armor, actively executing victims with an AR-15 type weapon and high capacity magazines.”

Betts’ rifle had a twin-50-round magazine inserted during his attack.

The use of SSRI antidepressant drugs by many mass shooters over the past decade is seen by some as a potential indicator for violence. But thus far, lawmakers have yet to focus in on this potential key aspect, choosing instead to opt for more gun control.

“Violence, especially random violence, is a complex manifestation of various thoughts, feelings, and external factors. When a multivariate analysis of these factors is conducted, it becomes apparent that it’s not just mental health issues that are leading to such an increase,” notes Ammo.com.

“There may be an underlying substance which plays a role in a high percentage of these violent acts – the use of prescription antidepressants, specifically selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, or SSRIs.

“At first glance, it makes sense that those involved in mass shootings may be taking antidepressants, as they’re clearly suffering from some sort of mental health issue,” the site notes further.

You Might Like

“But the issue with SSRIs runs much deeper than just a random mental health break. These drugs are a prescription for violent crimes, and that’s a story the anti-gun media and politicians don’t want to talk about.”

Dan Roberts, writing at Ammoland, lists several instances where mass shooters were known to be taking SSRI (Selective Serotonin Re-Uptake Inhibitors) antidepressants.

“Nearly every mass shooting incident in the last twenty years, and multiple other instances of suicide and isolated shootings all share one thing in common, and it’s not the weapons used,” he wrote.

“The overwhelming evidence points to the signal largest common factor in all of these incidents is the fact that all of the perpetrators were either actively taking powerful psychotropic drugs or had been at some point in the immediate past before they committed their crimes.”

  • The National Sentinel is a Parler media partner. Follow us on the platform by clicking here.

Subscribe to our YouTube channel

Sign up for our daily headlines newsletter

GOT SOMETHING TO SAY? COMMENT BELOW

You Might Like


Trending Politics

1
Leave a Reply

avatar
1 Comment threads
0 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  Subscribe  
Notify of
Patrick
Guest
Patrick

I would like to see a systematic investigation of the medical professionals who prescribed the SSRIs in every case of a mass murder incident, whether or not involving firearms. The investigation should examine any relationships or commonalities among the prescribers. Did they all go to the same college? Do they have mutual acquaintances? Have they corresponded with one another? This seems such an obvious step to take, particularly after the correlation between SSRIs and mass murders has been so scrupulously investigated and undeniably proven. IF government would perform its only legitimate function, to protect the citizenry against aggression, then this… Read more »

%d bloggers like this: