Joe Biden’s gun control plan is vintage Democrats: Turn in your AR-15s or register ’em with Uncle Sam

(TNS) Like a broken record, one by one the Democrats running for the 2020 Garbage Party party presidential nomination echo the same old unconstitutional things about our firearms: They want to ban them or, barring that, make Americans seek permission from the government to own ’em.



Saggy nuts Joe “I Owned Ukraine” Biden, who continues to rank high in most polls, is, of course, no different.

And neither is his gun control ‘plan.’

Like the rest of the Democrat ass clowns, Biden doesn’t know what the phrase “shall not be infringed” in the Second Amendment means. Or, perhaps more accurately, he just doesn’t give a shit.

He wants your “assault weapons” and by god, if he’s president, he’s going to get them or, at a minimum, make Mr. and Mrs. America register them with Uncle Sugar.

Per Breitbart:

Part of Democrat presidential hopeful Joe Biden’s overarching gun control plan is to pay AR-15 owners to surrender their rifles or allow them to keep the guns, as long as they register them with the government.

Biden’s plan would apply not only to AR-15s but also to AK-47s, variants of both rifles, and other firearms that Democrats label as “assault weapons.” The call to surrender or register would also apply to “high capacity” magazines.

Biden’s campaign site indicates he will give those who “possess assault weapons or high-capacity magazines two options: sell the weapons to the government, or register them under the National Firearms Act.”

Some of us around here recall when Democrat voters were angrily denying that Bitch Hillary wanted to do something similar had she managed to steal the Oval Office like she and Prick Obama tried to do with Spygate.

But it’s just ignorant for them to make such claims because there isn’t a Democrat douchebag out there who doesn’t want to confiscate our firearms or force us to shit on the Second Amendment by requiring government permission (licensure) to own them.

Notice the Constitution doesn’t say a damned thing about acquiring government permission before we can own and carry firearms. But the “shall not be infringed” part is pretty clear.

Everyone knows what gun registration precludes: Gun confiscation. It doesn’t take a genius to figure that out.

Well, Joe, consider this our electronic middle finger: Fuck you and your gun control. And ditto for the rest of your shit party.

  • We need your help to grow, pure and simple. If you like our big balls approach to defending President Trump and our republic, share our stories, make sure to tell your friends about this site, and click the red bell in the right corner for push notifications. We don’t do a regular ‘email newsletter’ anymore because it gets blocked. 

About us (you should read this)

GOT SOMETHING TO SAY? COMMENT BELOW



 

6
Leave a Reply

avatar
6 Comment threads
0 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  Subscribe  
Notify of
.50cal
Guest
.50cal

Retardo-wet-brain Joe wants to start a civil war.

It would take 23.4 years to confiscate all firearms in the USA. Probably longer if people are shooting gun confiscation faggots!

DDrake
Guest
DDrake

Websters Dictionary 1828: “MILITIA” MILI’TIA, noun [Latin from miles, a soldier; Gr. war, to fight, combat, contention. The primary sense of fighting is to strive, struggle, drive, or to strike, to beat, Eng. moil, Latin molior; Heb. to labor or toil.] The body of soldiers in a state enrolled for discipline, but not engaged in actual service except in emergencies; as distinguished from regular troops, whose sole occupation is war or military service. The militia of a country are the able bodied men organized into companies, regiments and brigades, with officers of all grades, and required by law to attend… Read more »

DDrake
Guest
DDrake

Websters Dictionary 1828: “ARMS” ‘ARMS, noun plural [Latin arma.] 1. Weapons of offense, or armor for defense and protection of the body. 2. War; hostility. Arms and the man I sing. To be in arms to be in a state of hostility, or in a military life. To arms is a phrase which denotes a taking arms for war or hostility; particularly, a summoning to war. To take arms is to arm for attack or defense. Bred to arms denotes that a person has been educated to the profession of a soldier. 3. The ensigns armorial of a family; consisting… Read more »

DDrake
Guest
DDrake

Websters Dictionary 1828: “DEER RIFLE”
No results found.
Please check your spelling.
Try unpluralized words or use a root word.
For further assistance visit our Facebook page.

DDrake
Guest
DDrake

It is very plain that the INTENT of the 2nd Amendment is for WAR. Weapons of war, which include so-called Assault Rifles, and any other “ARMs” carried for the PURPOSE OF WAR.
Any Democrat COMMUNIST/NAZI Registration is not only an Infringement and Affront, it is also an ACT OF WAR, by ENEMIES of the People.
In such case it is time to take up ARMS against them, to destroy those who intend to destroy us, and the BLOOD that bought our Liberty and Freedom.

.50cal
Guest
.50cal

He doesn’t need secret service protection. Nope, he’ll whoop out his shotgun, and blast you through the door. Dumbshit.

%d bloggers like this: