Left panicking as Trump, GOP Senate flood federal courts with constitutional originalists

Trump is ensuring the survival of our country as founded for decades to come

By Jon Dougherty

(TNS) You’ve no doubt heard 100 times that elections have consequences, and that’s absolutely true.

When Donald Trump won the presidency, his supporters were filled with glee that a Republican president would be paired with a Republican-controlled Congress to finally get a conservative agenda moving forward.

We were, of course, disappointed when we realized just how many RINOs there really were in Congress, especially in the House. Led by that political coward, Paul Ryan, little of President Trump’s agenda, save for tax reform, was passed during his first two years.

And after a massive number of Republican retirements, the GOP lost the House in November 2018, and now, as a consequence, the president has become just the third one to be impeached — despite the fact that he hasn’t done anything wrong or committed any “high crimes and misdemeanors.”

One good thing to come out of the 2018 midterms was expanded Republican control of the Senate. With a few exceptions, most GOP senators are supportive of the president’s agenda, and that is especially true when it comes to his appointment of constitutional originalists as federal judges and Supreme Court justices.

You’d think that every judicial appointment would be a constitutional originalist, given that federal judges are charged specifically with squaring laws and regulations with our founding document.

But of course, that’s not the case when Left-wing Democrats manage to become president and there are enough Democrats in the Senate to approve his nominees.

Obama appointed some of the most heinous judicial activists to the federal bench imaginable — men and women who couldn’t care less what the Constitution says but rather rule on cases based on their far Left political perspective.

Trump’s nominees, however, have been the kind of men and women the founders hoped for: Originalists who don’t see any other text in the Constitution other that what’s actually written.

Already, the president, with help from Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell and majority Republicans, has made a significant contribution to the federal bench, appointing some 133 district court judges, 50 appeals court judges, and two Supreme Court justices — or about one-fifth of the total number of federal judges in the country.

And he’s just getting started. Imagine how many more appointments Trump can made with a sustained Senate majority into and through his second term.

The Left is in a panic about that possibility, as evidenced by an article published in Slate this week.

You can tell the writer, Mark Joseph Stern, is sounding an alarm bell based on the alarmist language he uses to describe the progress the president has made in reshaping the federal bench:

These jurists are leading a conservative revolution that will upend decades of precedent and enshrine reactionary policies into the law. The transformation has only just begun. But for a glimpse of where the judiciary is heading if Trump wins a second term, Americans can look to the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. A traditionally conservative bench, the court has been newly reshaped by Trump—and quickly got to work translating right-wing priorities into legal doctrine that will govern generations.

The 5th Circuit’s descent into lawlessness did not happen by accident. Senate Republicans would not let President Barack Obama fill several seats on the court, allowing Trump to reshape it after taking office. He appointed five of the court’s seventeen active judges, who immediately allied with the court’s existing far-right bloc, which includes extremists like Judges Jerry Smith and Edith Jones (appointed by Ronald Reagan) and Jennifer Walker Elrod (appointed by George W. Bush). There are now 11 GOP nominees on the court and just five Democratic nominees.

Trump didn’t flip the court—it already had a majority of GOP appointees—but he neutralized the influence of moderate conservatives. Judge Catharina Haynes, for instance, was appointed by George W. Bush but sat near the ideological center of the court. A trio of Reagan appointees—Judges E. Grady Jolly, Patrick Higginbotham, and W. Eugene Davis—leaned right but supported judicial restraint and adherence to precedent. Trump’s five appointees joined the axis of extremists like Smith, Jones, and Elrod in 2018. This year, we witnessed the results.

First and foremost, the Senate is charged with giving advice and consent to judicial nominees, but there is nothing in the Constitution requiring it to do so.

In other words, if the Senate majority leader decides not to introduce a nominee for consideration, he doesn’t have to. And you can bet if the majority leader was required to do so by the Constitution, some Left-wing legal organization like the ACLU would have already sued to make it happen.

Elections have consequences.

Furthermore, where was this concern when Left-wing judges appointed by Obama were striking down President Trump’s lawful executive orders regarding the implementation of various immigration policies? Did Slate have a problem when an Obama appointee tried to tell the president he had no authority to declare a national emergency, despite clear authority given him by Congress in the National Emergency Act?

All of those decisions were reversed either on appeal or by the Supreme Court.

You see, when far-Left judges reinterpret laws and the Constitution to fit their political beliefs, that’s okay. But when a constitutional originalist appointed by a Republican president interprets the words on the founding document’s pages, it’s “lawlessness” and “right-wing extremism.”



But the bottom line is this: The Democrat Left knows that it cannot win enough elections to form a political mandate for its repressive, unconstitutional policies and laws. So they rely on the federal judiciary to force their agenda on the American people under the color of law and legitimacy.

The longer Trump remains president and the longer the GOP controls the Senate, the less likely it will be for the Democrat Left to “fundamentally transform” America into a country like the founders rebelled against.

Panic mode is full-on: The Left can’t afford another four years of Trump and GOP control of the Senate. But the country sure can.

  • We need your help to grow, pure and simple. Share our stories, make sure to tell your friends about this site, and click the red bell in the right corner for push notifications. 

GOT SOMETHING TO SAY? COMMENT BELOW


Get yours FREE!


You Might Like

6
Leave a Reply

avatar
4 Comment threads
2 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  Subscribe  
Notify of
.50cal
Guest
.50cal

I’m also pondering the SCOTUS. Have you noticed most look like weirdos and perverts? RBG advocated for the age of consent to lowered to the age of 12. Remember, satanists also wear black robes. Most of the degenerates Homobama appointed were advocates for all kinds of nasty crimes against nature. Wait till more Americans are red-pilled. Remember how normal all the people in Rosemary’s Baby seemed in public? Then during the end —the demon masks were removed. That’s what it will be like once the truth is revealed about these monsters. In the political sphere, in the media news sphere,… Read more »

Christian Gains
Guest
Christian Gains

“…These jurists are leading a conservative revolution that will upend decades of precedent and enshrine reactionary policies into the law…”
——————————————————————–
CLEARLY the COMMUNISTS are being WARNED & motivated…(BUT! WHAT of)??

OF: HATRED! VARIANCE! LYING! CHEATING! STEALING!…ALL of their NORMS of being “DEMwitz”/COMMUNISTS!! THAT is WHAT OF!!!

BEWARE! BE AWARE! PREpare! & CARE!

boyd
Guest
boyd

LET US PRAY THIS IS EXACTLY WHAT HAPPENS. ONE OF THE STUPIDEST DECISIONS OBAMANATION MADE DURING HIS 8 FRICKEN YEARS IN OFFICE, WAS TO NEGLECT FILLING ALL THESE JUDICIAL SEATS THAT TRUMP GLADLY TOOK THE JOB OF FILLING WHEN HE GOT INTO OFFICE. WHEN DONALD GETS 4 MORE YEARS TO CONTINUE DOING THE GREAT JOB HE IS ALREADY DOING FILLING ALL THESE SEATS, IT COULD BE WELL OVER 200 POSITIONS HE FILLS, ALONG WITH MORE THAN LIKELY A 3RD SUPREME COURT JUSTICE SEAT. AND HOPEFULLY WHEN HE LEAVES OFFICE IN 2024, IT WILL BE CLOSER TO 1/4 OF ALL FEDERAL… Read more »

SuzanneL
Guest
SuzanneL

I knew McConnel was sitting on Obama’s last SCOTUS nominee, because I suspect he suspected, like I did, that Obama had arranged for the untimely demise of Scalia, and he was not about to allow Obama to eat the fruit of his crime. I never understood Trump saying Obama had “inexplicably” left him 143 empty court seats to fill. Now I see he was just trying to irk Obama, and that it was McConnel all along sitting on those, too. McConnell deserves a big piece in future history books for his part (I see now huuuge) in saving the country… Read more »

%d bloggers like this: