Is it still possible to fight a world war in the nuclear age?

(Great Power War) Many experts have said throughout the atomic age that world war was no longer feasible or possible because of ‘mutually assured destruction’ from the use of nuclear weapons.

Indeed, most of today’s great powers are all nuclear-armed, to one degree or another: The U.S., Russia, China, India, France, Great Britain, Pakistan. Great or regional powers like South Korea, Japan, Australia, and European nations are all protected, via treaty or security agreement, by nuclear weapons.

So when I see someone opine that global war is still possible despite the existence of these weapons, I take notice.

In a column for Real Clear Defense, Brandon J. Weichert argues that not only is another world war on the horizon, but the U.S. military is but an “expeditionary force” far too small to handle it.

Read More

  • We need your help to grow, pure and simple. Share our stories, make sure to tell your friends about this site, and click the red bell in the right corner for push notifications. 

GOT SOMETHING TO SAY? COMMENT BELOW


Survival Legion $24.99 Black, Navy, OD Green, Gray


 

3
Leave a Reply

avatar
3 Comment threads
0 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  Subscribe  
Notify of
.50cal
Guest
.50cal

If the deep state wants a world war, then they’ll concoct a false flag event to ignite that world war.

USA has plenty of armed Patriots, hunters, armed citizens willing to defend against invasion.

The biggest enemy votes left!

Brutus
Guest
Brutus

Were that the case, we would have won Vietnam, Korea & the Middle East.
Mutually assured destruction is a concept not fully thought out.

.50cal
Guest
.50cal

Aside — Hey VA 2nd Ammendment supporters. Go look up Mountain Howitzers. They are awesome. Some people have them up here in the mountains.

24 lbs of grapeshot or ball.

Have fun with those commies!

%d bloggers like this: