Murkowski says she wants to hear impeachment evidence before deciding on witnesses, but there’s NO case against Trump

If she really cares about the Constitution like she says, she'll vote quickly to acquit

By Jon Dougherty

(TNS) Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) needs to figure out what she wants to be: A Republican on the side of truth and justice, or a Democrat who is willing to bend every rule, break every vow, and destroy the Constitution in order to remain in power.



In an interview with reporters Saturday, Murkowski the ‘Moderate’ (how come there are no ‘moderate’ Democrats?) said she wanted to wait and hear what House Democratic impeachment managers and the president’s defense team had to say before deciding whether to call for additional ‘witnesses.’

“I don’t know what more we need until I’ve been given the base case,” Murkowski said, adding that she expected Senate Majority Leader (R-Ky.) to table any attempt from Democrats to add certain witnesses to an organizing resolution, according to The Associated Press.

She indicated that she’d support tabling the Democrats’ request, saying that she’s “worked hard” to make sure the process allows for “determination” on whether additional witnesses or documents are necessary for the trial.

“But I want to have that at a point where I know whether or not I’m going to need it,” she said, according to the AP. “[My responsibility is] not to focus on the politics of where we are but a recognition that we are in the midst of an infrequent and in many ways extraordinary process that the Constitution allows for, and I’m going to take my constitutional obligations very, very seriously.”

She wants to “really hear the case” before deciding, she added.

We would ask, rhetorically, “Is she serious?” — but alas, we know she is. And frankly, that’s troubling.

If Murkowski’s Alaska constituency wanted her to take this wishy-washy, sorta, kinda, stance on impeaching a president whom she knows is innocent, that’s one thing, we suppose. After all, she was elected to represent them.

But if, on the other hand, this nonsensical, unethical, and confusing position on ‘witnesses’ is just another way in which she’s betraying her party and the president, then it’s unacceptable.

Anyone with a modicum of common sense knows President Trump is as guilty of impeachable offenses as House Speaker Nancy Pelosi is of committing acts of extreme fairness.

The entire House process was a sham — a sick joke designed not to ‘get to the bottom’ of the president’s ‘misdeeds, but a set-up from the get-go, and not an incredibly original one at that. It was a process largely conducted in secret. It was one-sided — Democrats only — and the president’s people weren’t allowed to refute or rebut anyone.

Indeed, the so-called “whistleblower” who was in contact with House Intelligence Committee chair Adam Schiff’s office the entire time wasn’t even deposed.

Now, suddenly, Murkowski is leaving the door open for…witnesses? To what? She knows this president isn’t guilty of what he’s been accused of doing. The House didn’t even cite a single law the president supposedly broke to justify the two articles of impeachment returned.

If ever there was a political impeachment, not one designed to punish wrongdoing in the White House under terms described by the Constitution, this one is it.

Hell, Democrats have even pledged to impeach Trump again — for something — if this one doesn’t succeed in tossing him out on the street.

So, enough of this “moderate” stuff. Enough of the waffling, feet-shuffling with head down, ‘Oh, I just don’t know,’ kind of vaguery.

We have a country to save, not just a president. We have a Constitution to salvage. And Republicans seem to be the only party interested in do that.

It’s time for Murkowski to drop the ‘go along to get along’ schtick, and stop letting those partisan jackals in the Washington media frighten her. Democrats have shown time and again they are willing to blow up the country — probably literally — to get back their power.

So step up, Lisa, and grow a spine. You said you want to do the right thing and preserve the Constitution; prove it by voting to acquit this president and stop this latest coup attempt in its tracks.

  • We need your help to grow, pure and simple. Share our stories, make sure to tell your friends about this site, and click the red bell in the right corner for push notifications. 

GOT SOMETHING TO SAY? COMMENT BELOW


12
Leave a Reply

avatar
10 Comment threads
2 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  Subscribe  
Notify of
.50cal
Guest
.50cal

Feinswine has that fat dyke under submission. Useless trash. She belongs in the Garbage Party, and she needs to shave her face whiskers.

Everett Miller
Guest
Everett Miller

She just wants to see her name in the news–she’s a disgusting politician in the best case, a traitor in reality. She is jealous of Lissy Graham who gets his goofus grin on every channel every day.
McConnell is at the precipice and on the verge of failing. VOTE GUILTY OR NOT GUILTY immediately after Trump’s lawyers’ rebuttal of the bee ess Articles.

IraMad
Guest
IraMad

The impeachment “case” is wholly contained within the two Articles of Impeachment. The evidence phase is past.
No. The Rinos and Leftists DO NOT get to continue their “fishing expedition!”
The case is presented (as-is) to the Senate. The Senate decides IF there is merit. That’s the procedure!
Dems know the articles are totally unsubstantial.
Blame your leadership. You don’t get a do-over.

ItsJo
Guest
ItsJo

If Murkowski isn’t “SMART ENOUGH to know that the Corrupt Democrat Party put on a dog and pony show with NON-Witnesses, as they TRIED to have a Sitting POTUS removed for ‘their feelings and NOT substantiated reasons, then SHE can play to ‘cameras and being a prima donna, all she wants-which seems she AND Susan Collins do this ALL THE TIME….then SO BE IT.’ She is supposedly a Republican, but it appears to be in name only…..and she wants to get some MILEAGE out of being what? Dumb…she CAN’T see Thru Adam Schiff, Pelosi and the “Gold Pen Caper, that… Read more »

Buzz
Guest
Buzz

If she wants to end her political career, then vote against Trump.

The Prisoner
Guest
The Prisoner

She’s waiting for any excuse to vote against Trump while pretending to be looking for justice.

adr. Dan Chapman
Guest
adr. Dan Chapman

Look at the fear in her face …. Why would the Jews attack their Toady Trump? “Never let the Goyim Slave get too powerful, he might GET IDEAS” THREE impeachments in the Nation’s history! NIXON — done in by Jewish Media in spite of flooding Israel with OUR wealth ……… CLINTON — poured gifts onto Israel … who was behind His impeachment? JEWISH agent Monica LEWINSKY for one………. TRUMP — giving the Jew everything they ever wanted, but dangerously rallying the Goyim to Populism and stirring the sleeping idiots ………… —————— This is a JEW-COUP of the American Government. Check… Read more »

Daniel Silvan
Guest
Daniel Silvan

What a brilliant idea. Listening to evidence and only then making a conclusion. Shaking the Democrat foundations.

.50cal
Guest
.50cal

Man-Face

Richard Stacy
Guest

The Democrats had to push a hurried impeachment to distract from the real crime by their Biden Five Crime Family that will ensnare Obama and the Clintons as well. This fake impeachment is going to be rejected immediately, followed by a Democrat bloodletting of epic proportions as Comey, McCabe, Strzok, Page, Clapper, Brennan, Hillary, Obama, Lynch, Powers, etc. all get indicted this summer by Durham and Barr. Prepare for a shocking total slaughter of the Left for decades to come.

%d bloggers like this: